Google faces the same problem. People searching for “the Great Barrier Reef” don't necessarily want only science-based information, which is why Google offers a variety of news headlines. On the day it all blew up, there was fresh news of the stress the Great Barrier Reef is under. Breitbart commented on this topic. It happened to get first place. It wasn't "pinned" there permanently, as the Gizmodo article suggested. It was shot as the news itself began to change. It was also not news for "scientific"
research, as previously explained. And no, Google didn't say the story was there because Google's job was to promote climate change conspiracy theories. Google said it's there as a natural consequence of delivering a range of news and viewpoints - which is jewelry retouching service usually what you'd expect from a search engine. If you want to go deeper with me in looking at the issues with this particular research, check out some of my comments in this Twitter moment. But the facts don't matter, in terms of Google's search quality reputation.
Google's outrage machine is fired up. After so many failures, I'd say many don't care about the important facts and questions to research, including how censorship could have unwanted backfire. They just see Google screwing up again, adding to the growing PR problem. Fix it! Google has problems to solve Do not mistake yourself. Google deserves a lot of criticism for some of the results it has shown. Even when there are reasons for hindsight, that does not excuse the need for Google itself to take corrective action.